Tag - members

Antonio Casilli and Julian Posada for Democracy Now !
Antonio Casilli and Julian Posada were both invited by the independent media outlet Democracy Now! to discuss their research on the hidden human labor behind artificial intelligence. In the interview, they take a deep dive into the hidden AI data workforce; the men and women whose labor makes chatbots and large language models (LLMs) possible, and who are increasingly becoming the new factory workers of the digital economy. Drawing on their research in Kenya, Madagascar, and Venezuela, they explore the working conditions of these workers across global labor markets, highlighting the significant inequalities between countries and, most importantly, bringing workers’ own voices to the forefront as they fight for dignity, recognition, and better working conditions. To see Antonio Casilli’s Interview click here And to see Julian Posada’s interview click here
September 1, 2026
DiPLab
Antonio Casilli Nominated for SXSW Festival
Congratulation to Antonio Casilli for his nomination by the Villa Albertine, the French Institute for Culture and Education to represent DiPLab at SXSW. South by Southwest is a major culture and technology festival that will take place in Texas next March. Antonio Casilli will discuss AI, labor, and the environment, and this festival will also be an incredible way to amplify the voices of of activists workers and scholars, from all around the world. Unfortunately, voting has already been closed. Looking forward to hearing Antonio’s speech, “It Takes a Planet (and Millions of Workers) to Make AI,” should it be selected.
August 20, 2026
DiPLab
Is your boss an algorithm? Paola Tubaro at the ASOR Institute in Santiago
Paola Tubaro was invited to give a talk at the ASOR Institute in Santiago in early July, and shared some results of her research in order to deepen dialogue on these important topics. She discussed how algorithmic management comes with a promise of higher productivity, but also increases surveillance in companies, while the apparent autonomy of self-employed workers on platforms—from Rappi delivery drivers to Workana designers—proves to be illusory. Her presentation, largely though not exclusively based on this open-access book chapter, analyzed the consequences of these transformations on job quality at two key stages of the AI life cycle: its production through human labor (so-called “data work”) and its deployment in workplaces across various sectors, from logistics to healthcare. Taken together, they reveal how AI accelerates preexisting trends in the global economy: the outsourcing of business functions while maintaining control over production—a phenomenon studied by D. Weil as the “fissured workplace”—and a “regime of dispersion,” first theorized by C. Datchary, in which workers manage multiple disconnected tasks. To protect job quality, she argued, corporate strategies and labor regulations must address the cognitive overload associated with fissuring, develop worker-centered organizational models, and implement safeguards for all users. The Millennium Institute for Authority and Social Regulation (ASOR), recently created in Chile, aims to conduct cutting-edge interdisciplinary research on the decline and reconfiguration of authority relationships in contemporary society and their impacts on social regulation. Authority, claim the founders of the Institute, is a pervasive social mechanism that is in place whenever there are power asymmetries. How people manage authority – in the family, school, workplace etc. – affects social cohesion and the extent to which (un)healthy relations of domination may arise. The rise of algorithmic management, especially AI-supported, is widely thought to affect labour relationships, endowing our bosses with new tools or even – as in the exemplary book by Aloisi and De Stefano) that algorithms actually are our new bosses. At the same time, the rise of platform labour – also closely linked to the AI boom – has promoted the model of independent workers who have no boss. Authority in the workplace changes gets more fragmented, disrupting traditional relational models, not only vertically (the hierarchical chain of command), but also horizontally (team composition, collegial work). What are the effects?
July 25, 2026
DiPLab